A friend complicates matters. The influence of personal proximity and framing on moral decision behavior A friend complicates matters. The influence of personal proximity and framing on  moral decision behavior To explain decision behavior by reducing it to utility maximization, as Kahneman and Tversky (2000) do, or to intuitive behavior, as Gigerenzer (1996) does, is to risk oversimplification. There is no single definition of rational decision behavior. The context defines what decision behavior can be evaluated as rational. In the context of morality, subjects base their decision behavior on four different ethical positions: deontology, hedonism, intuitionism and utilitarianism. In this article the classical Asian disease problem (ADP), used by Kahneman and Tversky (1981) to show the framing effect, is understood as a moral dilemma. To reach a decision, subjects relied to varying degrees on all four ethical positions. Variation of the ADP`s personal proximity influenced subjects’ decision behavior, leading to the disappearance of the framing effect, and changing the extent of subjects’ reliance on the four ethical positions. Книга по Требованию 978-3-6391-7770-1
3154 руб.
Russian
Каталог товаров

A friend complicates matters. The influence of personal proximity and framing on moral decision behavior

Временно отсутствует
?
  • Описание
  • Характеристики
  • Отзывы о товаре
  • Отзывы ReadRate
To explain decision behavior by reducing it to utility maximization, as Kahneman and Tversky (2000) do, or to intuitive behavior, as Gigerenzer (1996) does, is to risk oversimplification. There is no single definition of rational decision behavior. The context defines what decision behavior can be evaluated as rational. In the context of morality, subjects base their decision behavior on four different ethical positions: deontology, hedonism, intuitionism and utilitarianism. In this article the classical Asian disease problem (ADP), used by Kahneman and Tversky (1981) to show the framing effect, is understood as a moral dilemma. To reach a decision, subjects relied to varying degrees on all four ethical positions. Variation of the ADP`s personal proximity influenced subjects’ decision behavior, leading to the disappearance of the framing effect, and changing the extent of subjects’ reliance on the four ethical positions.
Бумага:   Офсет
Масса:   93 г
Размеры:   148x 210x 3 мм
Отзывы
Найти пункт
 Выбрать станцию:
жирным выделены станции, где есть пункты самовывоза
Выбрать пункт:
Поиск по названию улиц:
Подписка 
Введите Reader's код или e-mail
Периодичность
При каждом поступлении товара
Не чаще 1 раза в неделю
Не чаще 1 раза в месяц
Мы перезвоним

Возникли сложности с дозвоном? Оформите заявку, и в течение часа мы перезвоним Вам сами!

Captcha
Обновить
Сообщение об ошибке

Обрамите звездочками (*) место ошибки или опишите саму ошибку.

Скриншот ошибки:

Введите код:*

Captcha
Обновить